Should I Update My Sony X900e

Test Results

Design

Curved No

The X900E has a very typical Sony design, with a pocket-size stand that supports the TV well and a very functional appearance. There are slots at the rear of the stand for cable direction, but overall the design is quite minimalist.

The metal stand supports the Goggle box well and is very stable. It looks good, especially due to the tracks in each rear leg for cable management.

Footprint of the 55" Tv stand: ten.2" ten 19.8"

Wall Mountain VESA 300x300

The back of the Telly is very unproblematic, with metallic and plastic panels. If wall mounted, some of the ports may exist difficult to access.

Borders 0.43" (1.1 cm)

The borders are quite thin, and look good.

Max Thickness 2.28" (v.8 cm)

The Goggle box has an average thickness. If wall mounted it may stick out a bit, but this isn't likewise much of an effect.

Maximum Temperature 95 °F (35 °C)

Boilerplate Temperature ninety °F (32 °C)

The X900E is a adequately absurd Boob tube, and should never experience hot to the impact. Yet its power brick does become warm, up to 45 °C, though this isn't hot plenty to crusade any issues.

The build quality is very expert, all of the parts feel secure. The construction is very good with screws used to ensure good back up.

Picture Quality

Native Contrast 5,411 : 1

Dissimilarity with local dimming 6,534 : 1

The native dissimilarity ratio is very proficient on this Sony TV. With a ratio of around 5400, this is much better than the X930D. A loftier dissimilarity ratio is crucial for proficient night scenes performance while watching movies in a dark room.

Notation that this exam is done in SDR with local dimming off to showcase the true native contrast of the panel used in this TV. With local dimming set up to loftier with the aforementioned test pattern, the dissimilarity ratio was around 6500 with blackness level of around 0.015 cd/yard², which is even better.

Local Dimming Yes

Backlight Full-Assortment

The local dimming feature is boilerplate on the Sony X900E. When set side by side with terminal year'south X930D, it is conspicuously an upgrade visually, and we recommend it for normal viewing. When set up to maximum it tin sometimes feel a bit ambitious. If you visually see that it likewise ambitious, you can set it to medium or low.

SDR Real Scene Acme Brightness 481 cd/m²

SDR Peak two% Window 846 cd/g²

SDR Tiptop 10% Window 727 cd/m²

SDR Elevation 25% Window 551 cd/thousand²

SDR Height 50% Window 508 cd/m²

SDR Pinnacle 100% Window 513 cd/m²

SDR Sustained 2% Window 831 cd/m²

SDR Sustained 10% Window 710 cd/m²

SDR Sustained 25% Window 547 cd/m²

SDR Sustained 50% Window 504 cd/m²

SDR Sustained 100% Window 509 cd/k²

SDR ABL 0.031

Splendid SDR acme brightness. With both 'Machine Local Dimming' and 'X-tended Dynamic Range' set to 'Loftier', the X900e is able to make minor areas like our 2% window very vivid. The TV can't brighten larger areas as well as smaller areas just large areas are still very brilliant. The TV is able to maintain this loftier brightness indefinitely which is practiced.

HDR Existent Scene Tiptop Brightness 546 cd/m²

HDR Peak 2% Window 883 cd/m²

HDR Peak 10% Window 820 cd/1000²

HDR Elevation 25% Window 585 cd/g²

HDR Peak 50% Window 529 cd/m²

HDR Peak 100% Window 531 cd/m²

HDR Sustained ii% Window 871 cd/1000²

HDR Sustained ten% Window 780 cd/thousand²

HDR Sustained 25% Window 575 cd/m²

HDR Sustained l% Window 526 cd/one thousand²

HDR Sustained 100% Window 525 cd/m²

HDR ABL 0.033

Good all-circular brightness. Even the worst cases such as sustained 100% window remain very vivid. With 'Auto Local Dimming' and 'X-tended Dynamic Range' set to 'High' the X900E is able to make minor areas very vivid, and maintain this loftier brightness over time without fading.

50% Std. Dev. 3.784%

50% DSE 0.159%

5% Std. Dev. 1.054%

5% DSE 0.100%

The overall grey uniformity of the X900E is good. The 50% standard deviation is a bit college than what would be considered a good value, and this is cause past the darker corners and the general unevenness well-nigh the frame of the Television receiver. Luckily for sports fans in that location is not too much muddy screen upshot, as the center of the brandish is pretty fifty-fifty.

As for the v% uniformity, as well some brighter areas near the bottom corners there is not much to complain about which is great.

Colour Shift 22°

Effulgence 46°

Black Level 17°

This viewing angle is bad, but is fairly typical for a TV with a VA console. When sitting to the side of the Television set and viewing it on an angle, blacks volition look grey and colors will await washed out, though the effulgence volition stay fairly abiding.

Native Std. Dev. 1.203%

Std. Dev. w/ L.D. 1.014%

The X900E native black uniformity (whitout local dimming) is expert and is like to last yr Sony X930D. Some clouding can be seen, especially near the corners, but with a standard deviation of ane.203, this is still a pretty expert upshot.

With local dimming turned on, the result is equally good with a value of 1.014. This is a good sign that the local dimming is working well on the X900e

With local dimming plough on and with regular content, the faint clouding visible on our moving-picture show should not be noticeable.

Screen Finish Semi-gloss

Total Reflections 3.iv%

Indirect Reflections 0.4%

The TV is great at handling reflections. The semi-gloss finish helps to diffuse light on the screen which reduces the intensity. Fifty-fifty in a fairly bright room, reflections aren't an issue.

Pic Mode Custom

White Balance dE 2.15

Color dE 2.37

Gamma 2.17

Color Temperature half dozen,208 K

Out of the box in the 'Custom' motion-picture show manner the scale of the TV is excellent and could be used without any further adjustments. The white residuum is slightly too warm, only fifty-fifty then the white residual dE is only two.15 which is even so a proficient score. The color accuracy is too good, with merely the green tracking a bit worse than the other colors.

Motion picture Mode Custom

White Residue dE 0.25

Color dE one.97

Gamma 2.twenty

Color Temperature 6,516 Thou

Calibration of the X900E is very easy and fast to do with the provided two and 10 points white balance scale. The white balance was quickly brought to a negligible 0.25 dE, and the gamma bend was flattened to runway more than closely to the ii.2 value. The color space dE was brought down a flake, simply since in that location is no colour space management on this Tv, we could not bring information technology downwards farther. In whatever case, with a dE of ane.97 information technology is even so an excellent event that is well nether our good value of a dE of 3.

You can see our recommended settings here.

Upscaling of low-quality content such as DVDs is skilful. Details are preserved, only lines appear jagged. Very lilliputian haloing tin be seen.

720p content such as cable looks expert. The image is clear, merely some moiré from the photographic camera tin can be seen in the prototype.

Upscaling of 1080p content such equally Blu-rays is very good.

1080p content is handled differently from most TVs. Find out more in our Additional Review Notes.

Native 4k content is very articulate, and no issues can be seen.

Wide Color Gamut Aye

DCI P3 xy 88.66%

DCI P3 uv 93.94%

Rec 2020 xy 65.26%

Rec 2020 uv 72.05%

The X900E has a broad color gamut which is good for HDR content. Overall, deep colors will exist well represented only the Goggle box underperforms when reproducing greens.

Normalized DCI P3 Coverage ITP 80.4%

x,000 cd/m² DCI P3 Coverage ITP 46.5%

Normalized Rec 2020 Coverage ITP 64.1%

10,000 cd/m² Rec 2020 Coverage ITP 36.eight%

The X900E has decent colour book. It is able to show its broad colour gamut at a range of effulgence values, though it does struggle at the extreme ends of this range. Its colour gamut for extremely bright colors is smaller than at moderate brightness, and its blue tinted black level likewise prevents it from accurately showing very dark deep color.

Color Depth ten Fleck

Ruby-red (Std. Dev.) 0.103

Dark-green (Std. Dev.) 0.104

Bluish (Std. Dev.) 0.104

Gray (Std. Dev.) 0.046

The performance of this TV is excellent when displaying our gradient examination paradigm. Small imperfections tin can be noticed in the dark greenish and blue, but these are well-nigh negligible. The Boob tube can display gradients without whatsoever banding usually seen on an 8-fleck console and should provide first-class colour reproduction, especially in sky scenes for HDR movies.

IR subsequently 0 min recovery 0.04%

IR after 2 min recovery 0.00%

IR afterward 4 min recovery 0.00%

IR afterwards 6 min recovery 0.00%

IR after 8 min recovery 0.00%

IR after 10 min recovery 0.00%

The Sony X900E has some image retention, which is pretty unusual for a TV with a VA panel. The retention is actually faint and non as strong as seen on some IPS TVs. It is the first time we've seen image memory on a VA Tv. Notation that image retentivity is not a deal breaker in any way, just more a temporary badgerer, since it is not permanent.

Update 10/05/2017: We have retested the paradigm retention on our replacement unit (see here) and there is only very faint retentivity. The outcome has been updated, but note that there may exist some variance on a unit-by-unit ground.

Permanent Burn down-In Risk No

Nosotros don't expect VA panels to experience permanent image retention, as the VA panel in our long-term examination appears immune.

Motion

80% Response Time 4.7 ms

100% Response Time ten.vii ms

The response time of the X900E is outstanding and results in only a curt trail following moving objects. The xx%-80% and 80%-twenty% transitions take a bit longer than ideal, resulting in the blur visible in the moving logo paradigm. Overall, this Goggle box shouldn't accept any problems with fast-paced content.

Flicker-Free No

PWM Dimming Frequency 720 Hz

The backlight does use PWM to dim, simply only at very low backlight levels (at a setting of 8/50 or below). It flickers at a relatively high frequency of 720 Hz so content appears quite smoothen.

Update 04/xviii/2018: Note that with 'Local Dimming' and 'X-tended Dynamic Range' enabled, the TV always flickers (no matter the 'Brightness' setting.

Optional BFI Yes

Min Flicker for 60 fps 120 Hz

60 Hz for lx fps No

120 Hz for 120 fps Yes

Min Flicker for 60 fps in Game Mode 120 Hz

It is possible to reduce the flicker frequency to 120Hz by increasing the 'Motionflow' -> 'Clearness' slider. This does help to clear up motion, but non as well as the 60Hz flicker available on other TVs.

Motion Interpolation (30 fps) Yes

Motility Interpolation (lx fps) Yes

The TV has a 120Hz panel and is able to interpolate lower frame rate content to produce a very strong 'Lather Opera Effect' (SOE). To do so, conform the 'Motionflow' setting and increase the 'Smoothness' slider. The 'CineMotion' selection changes the threshold for interpolation. Set it to 'High' for the about SOE.

Frame Hold Fourth dimension @ 24 fps 31.0 ms

Frame Hold Time @ sixty fps six.0 ms

The Sony X900E is decent at displaying content smoothly, but for low frame rate content such as movies information technology does appear a bit stuttery, especially for wide panning shots, as each frame is static for ~30ms during periods of motion. For 60 fps content motion is shine.

Judder-Free 24p Yeah

Judder-Gratuitous 24p via 60p Yes

Judder-Complimentary 24p via 60i Yes

Judder-Free 24p via Native Apps Yes

The X900E can play movies from Blu-ray players, native streaming apps and cable/satellite boxes without whatsoever judder. Notation that when playing the movie from a 60p/60i source like cablevision TV, the 'Motionflow' option must exist set up to 'True Movie theater' and 'CineMotion' set to 'High' to take a judder-free experience without whatever motion interpolation.

Native Refresh Rate 120 Hz

Variable Refresh Rate No

4k VRR Maximum N/A

4k VRR Minimum N/A

1080p VRR Maximum N/A

1080p VRR Minimum Northward/A

VRR Supported Connectors Due north/A

The X900E doesn't support variable refresh rate features such as HDMI Forum VRR or FreeSync.

Inputs

1080p @ 60Hz 31.5 ms

1080p @ 60Hz + HDR 32.5 ms

1080p @ 60Hz Outside Game Style 105.5 ms

1080p @ 120Hz sixteen.ix ms

4k @ 60Hz 34.1 ms

4k @ 60Hz + HDR 34.ii ms

4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 34.1 ms

4k @ 60Hz @ four:4:4 + viii flake HDR 34.2 ms

4k @ 60Hz Exterior Game Mode 109.0 ms

4k With Interpolation 108.9 ms

4k @ 120 Hz Northward/A

4k with Variable Refresh Rate N/A

1080p with Variable Refresh Charge per unit N/A

Very good input lag overall. In game or graphics mode the input lag is ever lower than 35 ms, which should be practiced enough for all but the most competitive gamers. Outside of game or graphics mode though the input lag is quite high, making this Boob tube unsuitable for gaming with interpolation enabled.

Update 05/23/2017: The TV has been retested after the update to Android TV 7.0 Nougat, and the input lag is unchanged.

Update 07/18/2017: The TV has been tested with the newest firmware update (PKG6.2648.0065NAA). The input lag remains the aforementioned.

Update 09/xx/2017: Tested 1080p @ 120 Hz input lag using our new input lag tool. It is much faster than the 1080p @ sixty Hz input lag, probable due to the Television receiver bypassing some processing when information technology detects such an unusual signal.

Update eleven/10/2017: Retested input lag with the latest firmware (PKG6.2669.0070NAA); there was no significant modify.

1080p @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 Yes

1080p @ 120Hz Yep (forced resolution required)

1440p @ 60Hz Yes

4k @ 30Hz @ 4:4:iv Yep

4k @ 60Hz Yes

4k @ 60Hz @ 4:4:4 Yeah

4k @ 120Hz No

This TV supports all of the common input signals. But HDMI inputs two and three are capable of showing 4k @ 60 Hz @ 4:two:ii or iv:four:4 color, and simply when 'HDMI Enhanced Format' is enabled. 4:iv:4 colour is supported in both game and graphics mode.

Remarkably the Telly also displayed a 1080p @ 120 Hz input without showing the vertical line artifacts seen on the X930D. However when displaying this resolution while in game or graphics mode only crude upscaling was done on the 1080p image, and then the prototype looked almost equally jagged equally it would on a 1080p Television. Some people may prefer this await however because it retains nigh of the sharpness of the original image.

Update 06/12/2018: A annotation for Xbox One X and Xbox 1 Due south owners: 1080p @ 120 Hz from the Xbox is just supported on this TV when the Xbox'due south connectedness blazon is inverse from Automobile-find (Recommended) to HDMI: (Xbox > Settings > Display & sound > Video fidelity & overscan > Brandish > Connection > HDMI). Unfortunately in this fashion 4k, HDR, 50 Hz and 24 Hz aren't possible, and then this style is only recommended when the higher refresh rate of 120 Hz is more of import to yous than these other features.

Update 06/18/2018: Correction, 24 Hz and 50 Hz are in fact possible with the Xbox'southward connection type set to HDMI.

HDMI 4

USB 3

Digital Optical Audio Out 1

Analog Audio Out 3.5mm 1

Analog Audio Out RCA 0

Component In i (shared)

Blended In 2 (shared)

Tuner (Cable/Emmet) 1

Ethernet 1

DisplayPort 0

IR In 1

SD/SDHC 0

There is a shared component/composite port on the back, and an additional blended input on the side simply an adapter is not included. An instance of the correct adapter can be found here.

HDR10 Yep

Dolby Vision No

HLG Yes

3D No

five.1 Passthrough ARC Dolby Digital Yes

5.1 Passthrough ARC DTS Yep

5.1 Passthrough Optical Dolby Digital Yep

five.1 Passthrough Optical DTS Yep

HDMI ii.0 Full Bandwidth Yep (HDMI 2,3)

HDMI 2.ane Full Bandwidth No

ARC Yes (HDMI 3)

USB 3.0 Yeah (1)

HDCP two.2 Yes (HDMI one,ii,3,4)

CEC Yep

MHL No

Variable Analog Audio Out Yep

Wi-Fi Back up Aye (2.iv GHz, 5 GHz)

To enable sound passthrough, in the 'Action Carte' change the 'Speakers' to 'Audio System'.
This Television receiver does support a variable analog sound out, which means y'all can command the volume of wired headphones (similar the Beyerdynamic DT 770) directly with your Television receiver remote.

Sound Quality

Low-Frequency Extension 142.54 Hz

Std. Dev. @ lxx four.27 dB

Std. Dev. @ fourscore four.51 dB

Std. Dev. @ Max 6.51 dB

Max 90.1 dB SPL

Dynamic Range Pinch four.18 dB

Poor frequency response. Low-end cutoff of 160Hz means that this Tv won't produce much bass. Additionally, even though this TV doesn't go very loud, pumping and compression is produced as the volume is increased.

Weighted THD @ 80 0.078

Weighted THD @ Max xiv.200

IMD @ lxxx ii.92%

IMD @ Max 21.65%

Poor harmonic distortion operation. The overall amount of distortion at 70dB is very low, yet, but similar nearly of the other Sony TVs we've measured, there is a big spike in the overall harmonic distortion as volume is increased and the Boob tube is put nether heavier loads.

Smart Features

Smart OS Android TV

Version 6.0

Ease of Utilize Boilerplate

Smoothness Not Smooth

Fourth dimension Taken to Select YouTube 4 s

Time Taken to Change Backlight 6 south

Advanced Options Many

The Android Boob tube interface isn't as like shooting fish in a barrel to use as some other smart platforms. On this TV it as well sometimes has lag and inclement animations. The remote's 'Activity Menu' button helps to alleviate this by providing a quick menu with mutual functions and settings.

Ads No

Opt-out Due north/A

Suggested Content in Dwelling Yep

Opt-out of Suggested Content Yes

The main interface of the TV has no ads which is expert. Apps themselves tin can still take ads, such as video ads in the YouTube app. There is an option in the Television's settings to opt out of personalized advertising for these ads.

Past default the summit row of the home screen is filled with suggested content, but the sources of suggested content can be disabled one by one in the settings until there is only 2 TV instructional videos left in the row.

App Selection Very Many

App Smoothness Average

Cast Capable Yes

USB Bulldoze Playback Yeah

USB Drive HDR Playback Yes

HDR in Netflix Yeah

HDR in Amazon Video Yes

HDR in YouTube No

Out of the box most of the pop apps are preinstalled such as Netflix, Youtube and Amazon Video. Many more apps can be downloaded from the sizable Google Play Store.

Size Large

Vocalism Control Search, Some Other Features

CEC Card Control Yes

Other Smart Features No

The remote is fairly large and has a dizzying array of buttons, like the remotes of the X930D and X800D. The circular arrow button pad is surrounded past a circumvolve of other oft used buttons, and serves every bit the centerpiece of the remote. There is a microphone in the remote for Voice Search, which works well.

Update 12/11/2017: Google Assistant has now been added to Android TV on Sony TVs, and it brings a lot of new features to the voice control: commands like 'open up Netflix', 'switch to HDMI i', 'intermission video', 'how'southward the conditions' and 'turn off TV' all work well, though commands to change movie settings like 'set the brightness to 20' and 'switch to Game mode' don't work. The remote score has been increased to reflect the new fuctionality.

Acts as the Remote Yep

Straight Launches Apps and Inputs Both

Inputs Text in YouTube No

Inputs Text in Netflix No

Streams Device Files Aye

Controls TV Settings No

Vocalism Command Yes

The Android Telly remote app has fewer features than the apps of some other smart platforms, only can still be useful.

Update 09/12/2017: Sony has an app called 'Video & Goggle box SideView' that's better than the Android TV app in about ways. It adds a few features like launching both apps and inputs, and has 3 different remote modes, one beingness a mouse cursor on the Tv set. The score and data fields have been updated to reflect the Sony app.

Update 07/11/2018: Sony's Video & Television receiver SideView remote app has been retested on version 5.5.0. The remote app can at present stream video files and tin can only directly launch apps. The information fields take been updated.

Update x/12/2018: The remote app can directly launch both apps and inputs, fifty-fifty on version five.5.0; "Apps Only" was a mistake. The value has been corrected to "Both".

There are iii buttons on the back of the Television set that allow changing the channel, book and input. The center button selects either channel, volume or input while the (+) and (-) buttons increase the setting. The center button also serves every bit the power button and can ability off the Boob tube is it is held down for a few seconds.

• Transmission
• Batteries
• Remote
• Cable management ties
• RF Blaster

Power Consumption 57 Due west

Ability Consumption (Max) 139 Due west

Firmware PKG6.0710.0005Naa

Differences Betwixt Sizes And Variants

We tested the 55" (XBR55X900E). For the most part, nosotros look our review to exist valid for the 49"(XBR49X900E), 65"(XBR65X900E), and 75"(XBR75X900E). Unlike the other sizes, the 75" variant has an internal power brick.

If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their Sony XBR-55X900E doesn't correspond to our review, let the states know and we will update the review. Note that some tests such equally the grey uniformity may vary between private units.

Size	Model	Alternative Name	UK Model
49"	XBR49X900E	XBR-49X900E	KD-49XE9005
55"	XBR55X900E	XBR-55X900E	KD-55XE9005
65"	XBR65X900E	XBR-65X900E	KD-65XE9005
75"	XBR75X900E	XBR-75X900E	KD-75XE9005

Compared To Other TVs

Top left: Sony X930E (XBR55X930E). Bottom left: Vizio P Series 2016 (P65-C1). Eye: Sony X900E (XBR55X900E). Acme right: LG UH8500 (55UH8500). Lesser right: Samsung MU8000 (UN55MU8000).  Unlike our other photographs, this picture wasn't taken under a controlled environment, then do not depict conclusions from it.

The Sony X900E offers a compelling package that is very competitive considering its toll point. Picture quality is great, and its local dimming is a strong selling point. See our recommendations for the best flatscreen TVs and the best 4k TVs.

55" 65"

The Sony X930E is slightly better than the Sony X900E. The Sony X930E has marginally better input lag when sent a 4k @ 60Hz + HDR input indicate and can besides decode a Dolby vision signal, and this is peachy if you play HDR games. The Sony X930E has slightly improve SDR peak brightness which makes it suitable for watching TV shows in a brighter room and too has amend local dimming which improves motion-picture show quality when you lot sentry a film. On the other hand, the Sony X900E has a slightly ameliorate response time that will delight gamers.

55" 65" 75"

The Sony X900E is a fleck better than the Samsung MU9000. The Sony X900E has a chip better local dimming that delivers deep blacks and this is great if you lot watch movies in a night room. The Sony also has a faster response fourth dimension that leaves a shorter blur trail in fast activeness. On the other hand, the Samsung MU9000 has lower input lag for those who play video games a better reflection treatment then that y'all can place information technology a bright room without issues.

65" 75"

The Sony X900E is amend than the X850E. The X900E is brighter than the X850E in SDR and HDR, and the 900E has a decent local dimming feature that can dim nighttime areas of the screen. The Sony X850E has better black uniformity, good for viewing in a dark room, and has a better blackness frame insertion feature that can improve movement at the cost of some brightness. The 75" X850E uses an IPS panel, which is better for a wide viewing area.

49" 55" 65" 75" 85"

The 2018 Sony X900F is marginally better than the 2017 Sony X900E. The X900F has a better response time, and so fast-moving objects have very little motion mistiness that isn't noticeable to most people. The X900F too received an update that enables Dolby Vision support with the native apps and some external devices.

49" 55" 65" 75" 82"

The Sony X900E is better than the Samsung Q6FN. The Sony X900E has improve local dimming performance and tin display dark scenes better in a dark surroundings. When placed in the same bright room, the Sony X900E handles reflections better than the Q6FN. The X900E has a faster response time, and thus there is less blur in fast content. The Samsung Q6FN, on the other manus, is slightly ameliorate for gaming as it incorporates FreeSync VRR support and has a lower input lag that makes it very responsive.

49" 55" 65" 75" 82"

The Sony X900E is amend than the Samsung MU8000 in almost every usage. The Sony X900E has significantly better local dimming and slightly better contrast ratio and can display deeper blacks which is great if you lot scout movies or HDR content in a night room. Too, the Sony X900E has better reflection treatment, which is proficient news if you picket Idiot box shows in a brighter room. On the other manus, the Samsung MU8000 has a bit better input lag, and this will delight those who play video games.

49" 55" 65" 75" 82"

The Sony X900E is better than the Samsung NU8000 for most people, unless your main usage is for gaming. The Sony X900E has a better local dimming feature and better reflection treatment, making information technology improve suited to a wider multifariousness of viewing conditions. The Samsung NU8000 has lower input lag beyond all resolutions and supports AMD'southward FreeSync Variable Refresh Rate engineering science, making it a better choice for gamers.

65" 75" 85"

The Sony X850F is a improve choice for a room with wide seating due to its better viewing angles. The Sony X900E, on the other hand, is a meliorate choice if you have a darker room with directly in-forepart seating. The Sony X900E tin display better blacks due to higher native contrast ratio and meliorate local dimming. Also, if you want a brighter TV to enjoy Boob tube shows, so the Sony X900E is a ameliorate option as it has better SDR peak effulgence.

75"

The Sony X940E and X900E are very similar and offering nearly identical performance. The X940E has improve dark room performance due to the improved local dimming feature and improve black uniformity. The X900E has a much better response time and motion looks much smoother with very lilliputian motion blur. The X940E has been updated with back up for Dolby Vision.

55" 65" 75"

The Sony X900E is better than the Samsung 2017 Q7F QLED TV. The X900E is brighter than the Q7F and has a better local dimming feature, which is slap-up for movie lovers. Both models have excellent reflection treatment, just the Samsung Q7F is improve. The Samsung Q7F has a ameliorate colour gamut and volume, and movies look closer to the content creator's intent.

43" 49" 55"

If you lot have a wide seating organisation in an average lit room, the Sony X800E is a more suitable selection because of its better viewing angles. On the other manus, the Sony X900E has significantly improve local dimming, much better contrast ratio and a chip better black uniformity that make blacks look swell and improve movie quality in a nighttime room when you watch movies or HDR movies. The Sony X900E has slightly better move handling features like motility interpolation and 24p judder removal that will delight moving picture enthusiasts. Finally, the X900E has better reflection handling and this is good news for those who watch TV shows in brighter rooms.

55" 65"

The LG SJ8500 has slightly better viewing angles than the Sony X900E, and this is dandy if you have wide seating arrangements. The LG SJ8500 also has somewhat better inputs for utilize as a PC monitor and a bit better input lag, which makes information technology very responsive if y'all play video games. On the other hand, the Sony X900E has much better contrast and local dimming and better blackness uniformity that allows it to display deep blacks and amend picture quality if you sentinel movies or HDR movies in a dark room. Finally, the Sony X900E has improve SDR pinnacle effulgence and tin can easily overcome glare which is great for watching Boob tube shows in brighter rooms.

55" 65" 75"

The Sony X900E is somewhat better than the Vizio P Series 2017. The Sony X900E has better upscaling which is of import if you watch a lot of cable, and better gray uniformity. The Vizio P Series 2017, on the other paw, has a better input lag and a faster response time, which are of import to those who play a lot of games. Finally, the Vizio P Series 2017 has better blackness frame insertion (BFI) which can result in a clearer paradigm for gamers.

65"

If you lot have a large room with wide seating arrangements, then the LG SJ9500 is a ameliorate choice, but for a night room with seating directly in front, then the Sony X900E is better. The Sony X900E has significantly amend local dimming, amend contrast ratio, and improve black uniformity, which is great for watching movies of HDR content. On the other hand, the LG SJ9500 has lower input lag, which is great for gaming, and considering of its better viewing angles, you lot can utilize information technology every bit a PC monitor without worrying near the image deteriorating at the sides of the screen.

55" 65"

The LG B7A is better than the Sony X900E, unless you watch a lot of static content and the possibility of burn-in concerns you. The LG B7A uses an OLED screen, which has the possibility of burn down-in, but provides perfect night room performance and cracking wide viewing angles. The B7A has lower input lag, dandy for gaming. The Sony X900E doesn't experience any temporary image retentivity and appears to exist allowed to the effects of burn-in.

43" 55" 65"

The Sony X900E is much better than the LeEco Super4. The X900E is brighter and has amend reflection handling, making information technology a meliorate choice for a well-lit room. The X900E has a local dimming characteristic that improves dark room viewing, and the X900E tin can remove judder from all 24p sources.

+ Evidence more

Source: https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/x900e

Posted by: rugglesscuman.blogspot.com

Share this post